Lymphocyte apoptosis after major abdominal surgery is not influenced by anesthetic technique: a comparative study of general anesthesia versus combined general and epidural analgesia
Abstract
Study Objective
To examine the influence of abdominal colectomy with combined general anesthesia and epidural analgesia versus general anesthesia on apoptosis of circulating lymphocytes.
Design
Prospective, randomized, clinical comparison study.
Setting
Tertiary-care general hospital.
Patients
40 ASA physical status I and II patients undergoing elective open colectomy for nonmetastatic colon carcinoma.
Interventions
Patients were randomly allocated to two groups to receiver either general anesthesia alone (Group G) or general anesthesia combined with epidural analgesia (Group C). Group C comprised 21 patients while 19 patients constituted Group G. All patients underwent median longitudinal laparotomy.
Measurements
Blood samples were collected preoperatively and 24 hours postoperatively for measurement of lymphocyte apoptosis, serum cortisol, C-reactive protein (CRP), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR).
Main Results
There were no differences between the two groups in age, weight, or duration of surgery. No significant alterations in total lymphocyte counts, as well as in lymphocyte subpopulations (early apoptotic, late apoptotic, viable, and necrotic), were observed between the general and combined anesthesia groups. Cortisol, ESR, and CRP were significantly increased postoperatively in both groups. Group C presented with lower serum cortisol levels postoperatively than Group G (b = −5.38, CI95%: −8.72 to −2.05, P = 0.002).
Conclusions
Epidural block could not suppress postoperative lymphocyte apoptosis, increases in cortisol, CRP, or ESR compared with general anesthesia.
Keywords: Abdominal surgery, Apoptosis, C-reactive protein, Erythrocyte sedimentation rate, Lymphocytes, Surgical stress response
To access this article, please choose from the options below
PII: S0952-8180(09)00211-6
doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.10.015
© 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
