Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
Volume 21, Issue 7 , Pages 493-501, November 2009

Comparison of patient-controlled analgesia with and without dexmedetomidine following spine surgery in children

Department of Anesthesiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, MLC 2001, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA

Received 21 March 2008; received in revised form 1 December 2008; accepted 1 December 2008. published online 23 October 2009.

Abstract 

Study Objective

To evaluate the effect of dexmedetomidine as an adjunct to patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with morphine.

Design

Retrospective comparison.

Setting

University-affiliated children's hospital.

Measurements

The medical charts of 131 children with idiopathic scoliosis (IS) and NMS who had major spine surgery were reviewed. Out of 131, postoperatively 94 children received PCA with morphine alone (PCA group) and the remaining 37 children received PCA morphine and dexmedetomidine infusion at 0.4 mcg/kg/hour for 24 hours (PCA + Dex group). Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative morphine use data were collected.

Main Results

Intraoperative use of morphine was similar in children with IS and NMS. However, patients with IS used more morphine than patients with NMS on the first, second and third postoperative days in both groups. In children with IS, use of morphine on the second postoperative day was significantly higher in the PCA + Dex group (73 mg [50.5, 110.5]) than the PCA alone group (54 mg [36, 69], P = 0.03). The overall frequency of all perioperative complications was more in the PCA alone group (40% vs. 32%) than the PCA + Dex group.

Conclusion

Postoperative 24-hour dexmedetomidine infusion as an adjunct to PCA with opioids might have a morphine-sparing effect as evidenced by the increase in morphine use on postoperative day 2 after the dexmedetomidine infusion was stopped.

Keywords: Dexmedetomidine, pain, Patient-controlled analgesia, Pediatric anesthesia, Spine surgery

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0952-8180(09)00254-2

doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.12.017

Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
Volume 21, Issue 7 , Pages 493-501, November 2009