Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
Volume 21, Issue 7 , Pages 508-513, November 2009

Should anesthesia residents with a history of substance abuse be allowed to continue training in clinical anesthesia? The results of a survey of anesthesia residency program directors☆☆

  • Ethan O. Bryson, MD (Assistant Professor)

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationTel.: +1 212 241 9240; fax: +1 212 876 3906.

Department of Anesthesiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY 10029, USA

Received 18 October 2007; received in revised form 17 December 2008; accepted 18 December 2008. published online 26 October 2009.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.

 Summary Statement: The practice of allowing residents who have undergone treatment for substance abuse to return to their training program in clinical anesthesia remains highly controversial. A comprehensive assessment of the outcomes associated with alternatives to re-entry into clinical anesthesia training programs is needed.

☆☆ Support Statement: Support was provided solely from institutional and departmental sources.

PII: S0952-8180(09)00264-5

doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.12.026

Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
Volume 21, Issue 7 , Pages 508-513, November 2009