Original Contribution
The role of perioperative chewing gum on gastric fluid volume and gastric pH: a meta-analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2014.07.005Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Meta-analysis was used to examine if preoperative gum chewing affects gastric pH and fluid volume.

  • Chewing gum before surgery results in small increases in gastric volume but no change in gastric pH.

  • The small increases in gastric volume from chewing gum are likely of no clinical significance.

  • Elective surgery should not necessarily be canceled or delayed in patients due to chewing gum.

Abstract

Study objective

To determine if preoperative gum chewing affects gastric pH and gastric fluid volume.

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

Data sources included Cochrane, PubMed, and EMBASE databases from inception to June 2012 and reference lists of known relevant articles without language restriction. Randomized controlled trials in which a treatment group that chewed gum was compared to a control group that fasted were included. Relevant data, including main outcomes of gastric fluid volume and gastric pH, were extracted.

Results

Four studies involving 287 patients were included. The presence of chewing gum was associated with small but statically significant increases in gastric fluid volume (mean difference = 0.21 mL/kg; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.39; P = .03) but not in gastric pH (mean difference = 0.11 mL/kg; 95% confidence interval, − 0.14 to 0.36; P = .38). Gastric fluid volume and gastric pH remained unchanged in subgroup analysis by either sugar or sugarless gum type.

Conclusions

Chewing gum in the perioperative period causes small but statically significant increases in gastric fluid volume and no change in gastric pH. The increase in gastric fluid most likely is of no clinical significance in terms of aspiration risk for the patient. Elective surgery should not necessarily be canceled or delayed in healthy patients who accidentally chew gum preoperatively.

Introduction

Pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents is an uncommon event during the perioperative period with incidence, morbidity, and mortality estimates in the adult population of approximately 1 in 7000, 1 in 16,000, and 1 in 100,000, respectively [1]. Since Mendelson’s [2] original publication , several reports and studies of the incidence of aspiration have been published [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. Raidoo et al. [8] reported that the volume of aspirate required to produce severe pneumonitis with significant mortality was 0.8 mL/kg and that aspirates up to 0.6 mL/kg did not cause severe pneumonitis in a primate model. These findings are in contrast to those of Roberts and Shirley [9] who quoted a risk reference range of greater than or equal to 25 mL (0.4 mL/kg) gastric volume and pH less than or equal to ≤ 2.5.

The effect of chewing gum may influence gastric contents in a variety of ways, including increasing saliva and swallowing, increasing gastric secretions, and simultaneously increasing or causing no change to gastric emptying. Given that studies on gastric volume have found equivocal results [10], [11], [12], [13], some anesthesiologists cancel or delay operative procedures if a patient has been chewing gum [14] because they believe that perioperative gum chewing increases saliva production, thereby increasing gastric volume and decreasing gastric pH. The concern is that gastric fluid volume would increase to a degree that would place the patient at risk for aspiration during induction of general anesthesia [10]. However, whether chewing gum ultimately increases the risk of aspiration has not yet been definitively addressed.

The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) has developed practice guidelines for preoperative fasting to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration in healthy patients undergoing elective procedures [15]. The most recent ASA guidelines fail to address directly the issue of preoperative gum chewing, potentially leading physicians to vary, delay, or cancel a case rather than proceeding when the patient has possibly violated the nil per os (NPO) directive by chewing gum. Guidelines on perioperative fasting for children and adults from the European Society of Anesthesiology include the recommendation that “patients should not have their operation cancelled or delayed just because they are chewing gum, sucking a boiled sweet or smoking immediately prior to induction of anesthesia” [16]. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine if preoperative gum chewing affects gastric pH and gastric fluid volume.

Section snippets

Data sources and searches

This meta-analysis followed recent methodological guidelines Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) [17]. The aim of the study was to identify all relevant randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effect of chewing gum before anesthesia induction on gastric volume and pH by comparing patients who chewed gum preoperatively to fasted NPO controls. A search of the National Library of Medicine’s MEDLINE, Cochrane Collaboration’s CENTRAL, and the EMBASE

Results

In the systematic review, 4 articles provided data on 287 patients, with the gum-chewing and control groups including 174 and 113 patients, respectively [10], [11], [12], [13]. Table 1 provides study characteristics, including details regarding assessment of gastric pH and/or volume. One treatment group chewing bicarbonate gum was excluded from analysis given expected changes in pH [13]. The gum-chewing group in each trial initiated chewing in the immediate preoperative period, chewed gum at

Discussion

In the first systematic review and meta-analysis on this topic, we found that chewing gum before induction of anesthesia resulted in small increases in gastric volume but no changes in gastric pH. For example, chewing gum would increase the gastric fluid volume in a 70-kg patient by approximately 9 to 15 mL. Though statistically significant, this increase in gastric fluid most likely is of no clinical significance in terms of risk for the patient. The exponential half time (t½) of gastric

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Claire Levine, MS, ELS, for her help with the preparation of this manuscript.

References (26)

  • R.B. Roberts et al.

    Reducing the risk of acid aspiration during cesarean section

    Anesth Analg

    (1974)
  • S.A. Dubin et al.

    Sugarless gum chewing before surgery does not increase gastric fluid volume or acidity

    Can J Anaesth

    (1994)
  • E. Soreide et al.

    The effects of chewing gum on gastric content prior to induction of general anesthesia

    Anesth Analg

    (1995)
  • Cited by (28)

    • Multicenter Survey on Staff Understanding of Preoperative Fasting Guidelines

      2022, Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing
      Citation Excerpt :

      The tertiary pediatric hospital is an established pediatric center that has been using a fasting protocol for some time. Chewing gum is an area of much debate and the literature shows a slight, likely insignificant, increase in gastric volume.13 The survey, however, was assessing knowledge of the guideline which is deliberately conservative and treats chewing gum like food in case of swallowing.

    • Prevention and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Morbidity

      2021, Perioperative Medicine: Managing for Outcome, Second Edition
    • Chewing gum for 1 h does not change gastric volume in healthy fasting subjects. A prospective observational study

      2019, Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
      Citation Excerpt :

      Main outcome was identification of immediate changes in gastric content and volume with ultrasound after chewing gum in fasted healthy volunteers. Sample size calculation was based on the meta-analysis by Ouanes et al. [13] and the statistical calculator Granmo version 7.2 was used. First, a pilot test including 9 volunteers was conducted.

    • Preoperative Evaluation, Premedication, and Induction of Anesthesia

      2019, A Practice of Anesthesia for Infants and Children
    • Preoperative Evaluation, Premedication, and Induction of Anesthesia

      2018, A Practice of Anesthesia for Infants and Children
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Funding: supported by the Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University.

    1

    These authors contributed equally as first authors.

    2

    Role: This author helped design the study, conduct the study, analyze the data, and write the manuscript.

    3

    Role: This author helped conduct the study and write the manuscript.

    4

    Role: This author helped write the manuscript.

    View full text