Elsevier

Journal of Clinical Anesthesia

Volume 33, September 2016, Pages 309-314
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia

Original Contribution
A comparison of classic laryngeal mask airway insertion between lightwand- and standard index finger–guided techniques

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.04.032Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Efficacy of lightwand-guided and standard cLMA insertion techniques was compared.

  • Lightwand-guided technique provided a more objective indicator for cLMA positioning.

  • Lightwand-guided technique improved first attempt success rates and glottic views.

  • Lightwand-guided technique caused less damage to oropharyngeal or esophagus tissues.

Abstract

Study objective

To compare the efficacy of lightwand-guided classic laryngeal mask airway (cLMA) real-time insertion technique with the standard recommended index finger–guided insertion technique.

Design

Prospective, randomized controlled study.

Setting

University-affiliated hospital.

Patients

Three hundred patients undergoing minor gynecological or orthopedic surgeries under general anesthesia using the cLMA as an airway management tool.

Interventions

Patients were randomly divided into either lightwand-guided group or standard group.

Measurements

Fiberoptic bronchoscopy was used to determine the cLMA position after a cLMA was inserted. The first attempt and total success rates of the cLMA insertion, insertion time, distances from the end of cLMA pilot tube to the upper central incisors, views of fiberoptic bronchoscopy, blood staining, tidal volume, airway pressure, end-tidal CO2, SpO2, noninvasive hemodynamic parameters, and others were compared.

Main results

The cLMA was all successfully inserted within 3 attempts except for 2 patients in the standard group. The success rates of lightwand-guided insertion technique at first attempt were significantly higher than standard insertion technique; the ideal view rates assessed by fiberoptic bronchoscopy in lightwand-guided group patients were also significantly higher than in standard group patients, but the insertion time of first successful attempt was similar; the blood staining rates on the cLMA in lightwand-guided group patients were significantly less than in standard group patients. The depths of cLMA insertion in standard group patients were significantly deeper than those in lightwand-guided group patients. There was no significant difference in end-tidal CO2, SpO2, airway pressure, and hemodynamic variables.

Conclusion

Lightwand-guided cLMA insertion technique can provide a more objective indicator for correct cLMA positioning, higher first attempt success rates, better glottic views, and less damage to oropharyngeal or esophagus tissues than standard index finger–guided cLMA insertion technique.

Introduction

Since the classic laryngeal mask airway (cLMA) was first introduced into clinical practice in 1988, a variety of new extraglottic airway devices with some specific advantages have been developed [1], [2]. However, the first generation of cLMA is still widely used in clinical practice, especially in patients undergoing minor surgeries by providing a safe and effective alternative to tracheal intubation [3], [4]. The standard recommended cLMA placement technique is performed blindly and requires full insertion of the index finger into the mouth [5], [6]. The correct cLMA position is determined by feeling of resistance while the cLMA is pushed down in the pharynx [5], [6]. As a result, the first attempt success rate of cLMA insertion varies between 67% and 95% due to the lack of an objective indicator of correct cLMA position, unmatched cLMA sizes, and operator experience [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. In addition, more and more operators are reluctant to insert their index fingers into the patient's mouth [5], [12].

The standard rigid lightwand has been successfully used to guide difficult endotracheal intubation depending on the location of light [13], [14]. Furthermore, flexible lighted stylets have been used to help adjust the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) position for facilitating intubation through the intubating LMA [15], [16]. For these reasons, we conducted this study to evaluate the feasibility of the lightwand-guided real time insertion of the cLMA, which offers significant benefits such as having no need to insert fingers into the patient's mouth.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

After obtaining approval from institutional ethics committee and written informed consent from all the subjects participating in the study, 300 patients scheduled for elective gynecological or orthopedic surgeries under general anesthesia in supine position with anticipated duration less than 45 minutes were enrolled. The inclusion criteria for the study were as follows: (a) patients of either sex, aged 20 to 65 years, body mass index (BMI) 20 to 25 kg/m2, and (b) American Society of

Results

The 2 groups were similar in sex, age, weight, BMI, Mallampati score, thyromental distance, and ASA physical status (Table 1).

In all except 2 patients in standard insertion group, the cLMA was successfully inserted within 3 attempts. The success rates of lightwand-guided insertion technique at first attempt of insertion were 92% (138/150), significantly higher than standard insertion technique (76%, 114/150); the perfect view rates assessed by fiberoptic bronchoscopy for lightwand-guided

Discussion

Lightwand is a rapid, effective, and safe tool for facilitating intubation in patients with difficult airway and in patients required for minimal neck movements through transillumination in the neck [14], [19]. Whether lightwand-guided technique can also be used for guiding real-time insertion of the cLMA remains unclear. In present study, we found that the lightwand-guided cLMA insertion technique helped anesthesiologist get higher success rates at the first attempt of cLMA insertion, better

References (24)

  • A. Brain

    Proper technique for insertion of the laryngeal mask

    Anesthesiology

    (1990)
  • H.G. Wakeling et al.

    The laryngeal mask airway: a comparison between two insertion techniques

    Anesth Analg

    (1997)
  • View full text