Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
Volume 12, Issue 1 , Pages 31-35, February 2000

Comparison of acute normovolemic hemodilution and preoperative autologous blood donation in clinical practice

  • Dinna B Billote, MD (Instructor in Anesthesiology)

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Dr. Billote at the Department of Anesthesia, Columbus Hospital, 2520 No. Lakeview Ave., Chicago, IL 60614, USA
  • ,
  • Akram G Abdoue, MD (Resident in Anesthesiology)

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Anesthesiology and Orthopedic Surgery, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, IL, USA
  • ,
  • Richard L Wixson, MD (Professor of Orthopedic Surgery)

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Anesthesiology and Orthopedic Surgery, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, IL, USA

Received 4 May 1999; received in revised form 12 October 1999; accepted 12 October 1999.

Abstract 

Study Objective: To compare, by model simulation, acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH) and preoperative autologous blood donation (PABD) to predict their efficacy in current clinical practice. To discuss their similarities and offer guidelines based on expected operative blood loss.

Design: Model simulation using data obtained from total hip arthroplasty procedures.

Setting: University medical center.

Patients: 91 patients who participated in PABD undergoing single, primary, total hip replacement surgeries from January to December 1997.

Interventions: A nonanemic (Hb baseline 14 g/dL), average-sized patient (estimated blood volume 5,000 mL) who donated two units by either PABD or ANH was assumed for model simulation. The Hb-final, as a function of 250-mL blood loss increments after retransfusion of two autologous units, was calculated for each technique and compared to a control (nondonor) to predict the effectiveness of PABD and ANH in conserving red cell mass. Data from hip arthroplasties over a 12-month period were used to determine the parameters for the model. Results were subjected to regression analysis and tested for parallelism of slopes, with p < 0.05 accepted to indicate a statistical difference.

Main Results: The difference in Hb-final between PABD and ANH was not statistically different over a wide range of blood loss. When compared to control, there was no difference in Hb-final measurements in the estimated blood loss (EBL) range of less than 1,000 mL. ANH and PABD provide some benefit when EBL is greater than 1,500 mL in nonanemic, average-sized patients. As blood loss increases, the benefit of autologous collection becomes more clinically evident.

Conclusion: PABD exemplifies a “chronic” form of ANH in current clinical practice and offers little advantage over ANH as a blood conservation technique for high-blood-loss operations. When surgical blood loss is predictably mild to moderate (range 250 to 1,000 mL), neither blood conservation technique is necessary.

Keywords:  Blood, autologous transfusion, blood donation, autologous, preoperative, hemodilution, acute normovolemic

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0952-8180(99)00129-4

Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
Volume 12, Issue 1 , Pages 31-35, February 2000